Review





Similar Products

94
MedChemExpress runx2 antibody
Runx2 Antibody, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+runx2+antibody/custom%40hy-p80316%4042217588?v=MedChemExpress
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
runx2 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Bioss primary antibodies against runx2
Primary Antibodies Against Runx2, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+runx2+antibody/pm42108471-64-0-6?v=Bioss
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
primary antibodies against runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti runx2
Anti Runx2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+runx2+antibody/pmc13019078-157-8-11?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Cell Signaling Technology Inc runx2
In vivo evaluation of bone regeneration after hydrogel implantation in the mandibular bone defect mouse model. a) Schematic illustration of the mandibular bone defect mouse model. b) Micro-CT 3D reconstruction images of the mandibular bone samples at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 1 mm. c) Semi-quantitative analysis of BV/TV, bone surface, Tb.N and Tb.sp (n = 6) in mouse mandibular bone defects implanted with different hydrogels at 8 weeks post-surgery. d) H&E staining and Masson trichrome staining of tissue sections of mandibular defects at 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 100 μm. e, f) Immunofluorescent staining images and corresponding semi-quantitative analysis of the expression levels of <t>RUNX2</t> and OCN in mandibular bone defect areas at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery (n = 3). Scale bar = 50 μm. P-values are calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n.s. not significant ( a was created with bioRender. com).
Runx2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+runx2+antibody/pmc12969473-312-60-64?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Huabio Inc runx2
In vivo evaluation of bone regeneration after hydrogel implantation in the mandibular bone defect mouse model. a) Schematic illustration of the mandibular bone defect mouse model. b) Micro-CT 3D reconstruction images of the mandibular bone samples at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 1 mm. c) Semi-quantitative analysis of BV/TV, bone surface, Tb.N and Tb.sp (n = 6) in mouse mandibular bone defects implanted with different hydrogels at 8 weeks post-surgery. d) H&E staining and Masson trichrome staining of tissue sections of mandibular defects at 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 100 μm. e, f) Immunofluorescent staining images and corresponding semi-quantitative analysis of the expression levels of <t>RUNX2</t> and OCN in mandibular bone defect areas at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery (n = 3). Scale bar = 50 μm. P-values are calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n.s. not significant ( a was created with bioRender. com).
Runx2, supplied by Huabio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+runx2+antibody/pm42320599-88-8-12?v=Huabio+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Wanleibio runx2
In vivo evaluation of bone regeneration after hydrogel implantation in the mandibular bone defect mouse model. a) Schematic illustration of the mandibular bone defect mouse model. b) Micro-CT 3D reconstruction images of the mandibular bone samples at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 1 mm. c) Semi-quantitative analysis of BV/TV, bone surface, Tb.N and Tb.sp (n = 6) in mouse mandibular bone defects implanted with different hydrogels at 8 weeks post-surgery. d) H&E staining and Masson trichrome staining of tissue sections of mandibular defects at 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 100 μm. e, f) Immunofluorescent staining images and corresponding semi-quantitative analysis of the expression levels of <t>RUNX2</t> and OCN in mandibular bone defect areas at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery (n = 3). Scale bar = 50 μm. P-values are calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n.s. not significant ( a was created with bioRender. com).
Runx2, supplied by Wanleibio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+runx2+antibody/pm42259464-82-19-21?v=Wanleibio
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse anti runx2
In vivo evaluation of bone regeneration after hydrogel implantation in the mandibular bone defect mouse model. a) Schematic illustration of the mandibular bone defect mouse model. b) Micro-CT 3D reconstruction images of the mandibular bone samples at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 1 mm. c) Semi-quantitative analysis of BV/TV, bone surface, Tb.N and Tb.sp (n = 6) in mouse mandibular bone defects implanted with different hydrogels at 8 weeks post-surgery. d) H&E staining and Masson trichrome staining of tissue sections of mandibular defects at 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 100 μm. e, f) Immunofluorescent staining images and corresponding semi-quantitative analysis of the expression levels of <t>RUNX2</t> and OCN in mandibular bone defect areas at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery (n = 3). Scale bar = 50 μm. P-values are calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n.s. not significant ( a was created with bioRender. com).
Mouse Anti Runx2, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+runx2+antibody/pmc12996643-51-45-49?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Abmart Inc phospho runx2
In vivo evaluation of bone regeneration after hydrogel implantation in the mandibular bone defect mouse model. a) Schematic illustration of the mandibular bone defect mouse model. b) Micro-CT 3D reconstruction images of the mandibular bone samples at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 1 mm. c) Semi-quantitative analysis of BV/TV, bone surface, Tb.N and Tb.sp (n = 6) in mouse mandibular bone defects implanted with different hydrogels at 8 weeks post-surgery. d) H&E staining and Masson trichrome staining of tissue sections of mandibular defects at 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 100 μm. e, f) Immunofluorescent staining images and corresponding semi-quantitative analysis of the expression levels of <t>RUNX2</t> and OCN in mandibular bone defect areas at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery (n = 3). Scale bar = 50 μm. P-values are calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n.s. not significant ( a was created with bioRender. com).
Phospho Runx2, supplied by Abmart Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+runx2+antibody/pm42120379-461-35-38?v=Abmart+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
phospho runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Abmart Inc runx2
In vivo evaluation of bone regeneration after hydrogel implantation in the mandibular bone defect mouse model. a) Schematic illustration of the mandibular bone defect mouse model. b) Micro-CT 3D reconstruction images of the mandibular bone samples at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 1 mm. c) Semi-quantitative analysis of BV/TV, bone surface, Tb.N and Tb.sp (n = 6) in mouse mandibular bone defects implanted with different hydrogels at 8 weeks post-surgery. d) H&E staining and Masson trichrome staining of tissue sections of mandibular defects at 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 100 μm. e, f) Immunofluorescent staining images and corresponding semi-quantitative analysis of the expression levels of <t>RUNX2</t> and OCN in mandibular bone defect areas at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery (n = 3). Scale bar = 50 μm. P-values are calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n.s. not significant ( a was created with bioRender. com).
Runx2, supplied by Abmart Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+runx2+antibody/pm42120379-454-18-22?v=Abmart+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Proteintech antibodies against runx2
Fstl1 enhances the osteogenic differentiation potential of MC3T3-E1 cells. (A) Representative alkaline-phosphatase (ALP) staining at 7 d. (B) Quantitative ALP activity. (C) Representative Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining at 14 d. (D) Quantification of ARS absorbance (OD 562 ). (E-H) Relative mRNA expression of <t>Runx2,</t> Sp7, Ocn, and Opn at 14 d determined by RT-qPCR. (I) Western-blot bands for RUNX2 and SP7. (J and K) Densitometric ratios of RUNX2/GAPDH and SP7/GAPDH. Sample sizes: con ( n = 3), OE-Fstl1 ( n = 3), and sh-Fstl1 ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD; inter-group comparisons were performed using 1-way ANOVA. * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001, **** p < .0001; ns, not significant.
Antibodies Against Runx2, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+runx2+antibody/pmc13050501-80-0-21?v=Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


In vivo evaluation of bone regeneration after hydrogel implantation in the mandibular bone defect mouse model. a) Schematic illustration of the mandibular bone defect mouse model. b) Micro-CT 3D reconstruction images of the mandibular bone samples at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 1 mm. c) Semi-quantitative analysis of BV/TV, bone surface, Tb.N and Tb.sp (n = 6) in mouse mandibular bone defects implanted with different hydrogels at 8 weeks post-surgery. d) H&E staining and Masson trichrome staining of tissue sections of mandibular defects at 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 100 μm. e, f) Immunofluorescent staining images and corresponding semi-quantitative analysis of the expression levels of RUNX2 and OCN in mandibular bone defect areas at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery (n = 3). Scale bar = 50 μm. P-values are calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n.s. not significant ( a was created with bioRender. com).

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: MSC-mimicking nanovesicle embedded bio-adhesive hydrogel for dual immunomodulation and osteogenesis to promote maxillofacial bone regeneration

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.032

Figure Lengend Snippet: In vivo evaluation of bone regeneration after hydrogel implantation in the mandibular bone defect mouse model. a) Schematic illustration of the mandibular bone defect mouse model. b) Micro-CT 3D reconstruction images of the mandibular bone samples at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 1 mm. c) Semi-quantitative analysis of BV/TV, bone surface, Tb.N and Tb.sp (n = 6) in mouse mandibular bone defects implanted with different hydrogels at 8 weeks post-surgery. d) H&E staining and Masson trichrome staining of tissue sections of mandibular defects at 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 100 μm. e, f) Immunofluorescent staining images and corresponding semi-quantitative analysis of the expression levels of RUNX2 and OCN in mandibular bone defect areas at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery (n = 3). Scale bar = 50 μm. P-values are calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n.s. not significant ( a was created with bioRender. com).

Article Snippet: After blocking with 5% skimmed milk (diluted with TBST), the membranes were probed with the primary antibodies for CD90 (1:1000, Cat. ab92574, Abcam, UK), CD146 (1:1000, Cat. ab75769, Abcam, London, UK), CD105 (1:500, Cat. sc18838, Santa, USA), CXCR4 (1:250, Cat. 35-8800, Invitrogen, CA, USA), Na + /K + ATPase (1:1000, Cat. sc28800, Santa, USA), BMP2 (1:1000, Cat. ab284387, Abcam, UK), RUNX2 (1:1000, Cat. 12556, Cell Signaling Technology, USA) and β -actin (1:10000, Cat. T0022, Affinity, China) overnight at 4 °C, followed by bathing with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated secondary antibodies (1:5000, Cat. S0002 or Cat. S0001, Affinity, China).

Techniques: In Vivo, Micro-CT, Staining, Expressing

The PEG-pp@nMSC@MT hydrogel effectively promotes BMMSCs' osteogenesis in vitro . a) Schematic illustration of co-culture BMMSCs with hydrogels. b) ALP staining of BMMSCs co-cultured with different scaffolds after 7 days. Scale bar = 500 μm. c) Semi-quantitative analysis of ALP staining (n = 3). d) ARS staining of BMMSC co-cultured with different scaffolds after 21 days. Scale bar = 500 μm. e) Semi-quantitative analysis of ARS staining (n = 3). f) mRNA expression of osteogenic genes (BMP2, OCN, and RUNX2) of BMMSCs treated with different hydrogels in the MMP condition after 5 and 10 days (n = 3). g) Western blot analysis of osteogenic protein (BMP2 and RUNX2) of BMMSCs treated with different hydrogels in the MMP condition after 7 and 14 days. P-values are calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n.s. not significant ( a was created with bioRender. com).

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: MSC-mimicking nanovesicle embedded bio-adhesive hydrogel for dual immunomodulation and osteogenesis to promote maxillofacial bone regeneration

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.032

Figure Lengend Snippet: The PEG-pp@nMSC@MT hydrogel effectively promotes BMMSCs' osteogenesis in vitro . a) Schematic illustration of co-culture BMMSCs with hydrogels. b) ALP staining of BMMSCs co-cultured with different scaffolds after 7 days. Scale bar = 500 μm. c) Semi-quantitative analysis of ALP staining (n = 3). d) ARS staining of BMMSC co-cultured with different scaffolds after 21 days. Scale bar = 500 μm. e) Semi-quantitative analysis of ARS staining (n = 3). f) mRNA expression of osteogenic genes (BMP2, OCN, and RUNX2) of BMMSCs treated with different hydrogels in the MMP condition after 5 and 10 days (n = 3). g) Western blot analysis of osteogenic protein (BMP2 and RUNX2) of BMMSCs treated with different hydrogels in the MMP condition after 7 and 14 days. P-values are calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n.s. not significant ( a was created with bioRender. com).

Article Snippet: After blocking with 5% skimmed milk (diluted with TBST), the membranes were probed with the primary antibodies for CD90 (1:1000, Cat. ab92574, Abcam, UK), CD146 (1:1000, Cat. ab75769, Abcam, London, UK), CD105 (1:500, Cat. sc18838, Santa, USA), CXCR4 (1:250, Cat. 35-8800, Invitrogen, CA, USA), Na + /K + ATPase (1:1000, Cat. sc28800, Santa, USA), BMP2 (1:1000, Cat. ab284387, Abcam, UK), RUNX2 (1:1000, Cat. 12556, Cell Signaling Technology, USA) and β -actin (1:10000, Cat. T0022, Affinity, China) overnight at 4 °C, followed by bathing with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated secondary antibodies (1:5000, Cat. S0002 or Cat. S0001, Affinity, China).

Techniques: In Vitro, Co-Culture Assay, Staining, Cell Culture, Expressing, Western Blot

Fstl1 enhances the osteogenic differentiation potential of MC3T3-E1 cells. (A) Representative alkaline-phosphatase (ALP) staining at 7 d. (B) Quantitative ALP activity. (C) Representative Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining at 14 d. (D) Quantification of ARS absorbance (OD 562 ). (E-H) Relative mRNA expression of Runx2, Sp7, Ocn, and Opn at 14 d determined by RT-qPCR. (I) Western-blot bands for RUNX2 and SP7. (J and K) Densitometric ratios of RUNX2/GAPDH and SP7/GAPDH. Sample sizes: con ( n = 3), OE-Fstl1 ( n = 3), and sh-Fstl1 ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD; inter-group comparisons were performed using 1-way ANOVA. * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001, **** p < .0001; ns, not significant.

Journal: JBMR Plus

Article Title: Follistatin-like protein 1 (FSTL1) modulates bone remodeling and attenuates bone loss in a mouse model of postmenopausal osteoporosis

doi: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziag037

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fstl1 enhances the osteogenic differentiation potential of MC3T3-E1 cells. (A) Representative alkaline-phosphatase (ALP) staining at 7 d. (B) Quantitative ALP activity. (C) Representative Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining at 14 d. (D) Quantification of ARS absorbance (OD 562 ). (E-H) Relative mRNA expression of Runx2, Sp7, Ocn, and Opn at 14 d determined by RT-qPCR. (I) Western-blot bands for RUNX2 and SP7. (J and K) Densitometric ratios of RUNX2/GAPDH and SP7/GAPDH. Sample sizes: con ( n = 3), OE-Fstl1 ( n = 3), and sh-Fstl1 ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD; inter-group comparisons were performed using 1-way ANOVA. * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001, **** p < .0001; ns, not significant.

Article Snippet: Antibodies against RUNX2, SP7, NFATC1, and CTSK were purchased from Abcam, while the anti-GAPDH antibody and anti-FSTL1 antibody were obtained from Proteintech.

Techniques: Staining, Activity Assay, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot